Evolution of macro and micromorphology of Eriocaulon (Eriocaulaceae) and its relation with the aquatic environment
Main Article Content
Abstract
Eriocaulon L. is a pantropical genus comprising approximately 495 species. Previous taxonomic studies have proposed infrageneric classifications based on selected morphological characters; however, molecular phylogenetic analyses have shown that most of these classifications are paraphyletic. A recent multivariate analysis of anatomical data identified two major groups within the genus: one composed of amphibious species and the other of aquatic species. In this context, the present study aims to test the hypothesis that these groups correspond to distinct evolutionary clades by conducting a cladistic analysis of Eriocaulon based on morphological data. Our analysis included 65 species of Eriocaulon and seven outgroup species, using a dataset of 89 macro- and micromorphological characters. Parsimony analyses conducted in TNT recovered 24 equally parsimonious trees. In all analyses, Eriocaulon was resolved into two main clades. One clade comprises amphibious species from Africa and the Americas and shares plesiomorphic character states with Mesanthemum Körn., including palisade epidermal cells, stomatal chambers, and numerous vascular bundles in the leaf. The other clade, comprising aquatic species distributed across all continents, is characterized by derived character states, including a reduced number of vascular bundles, isodiametric epidermal cells, and the loss of stomatal chambers. These results suggest that the evolutionary history of Eriocaulon is closely tied to anatomical adaptations that facilitate colonization of aquatic environments.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
ANDRADE M.J. G., GIULIETTI A.M., RAPINI A., QUEIROZ L.P., CONCEIÇÃO A.S. & P.R.M. ALMEIDA 2010. A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Eriocaulaceae: evidence from nuclear (ITS) and plastid (psbA-trnH and trnL-F) DNA sequences. Taxon 59(2): 379–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.592004
ANSARI, R. & N.P. BALAKRISHNAN 1994. The family Eriocaulaceae in India. Shiva Offset Press: Dehra Dun, p.188.
ASSIS L.C.S. 2009. Coherence, correspondence, and the renaissance of morphology in phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics 25: 528–544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00261.x
ASSIS L.C.S. & O. RIEPPEL 2011. Are monophyly and synapomorphy the same or different? Revisiting the role of morphology in phylogenetics. Cladistics 27: 94–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00317.x
BALEEIRO P., ITO Y. & R.W. JOBSON 2025. Molecular phylogenetics of Asian-Australian Eriocaulon (Eriocaulaceae) based on one nuclear and three plastid markers. Taxon 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.70046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.70046
BARTHLOTT W. 1981. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nordic Journal of Botany 1(3): 345–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1981.tb00704.x
BREMER K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1994.tb00179.x
DARSHETKAR A., DATAR M., PRABHUKUMAR K., KIM S., SHUBHADA T. & R.K. CHOUDHARY 2021. Systematic analysis of the genus Eriocaulon L. in India based on molecular and morphological evidence. Systematics and Biodiversity 19(7): 693–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2021.1914764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2021.1914764
FYSON P.F. 1919-1923. The Indian species of Eriocaulon. Journal of Indian Botany 1: 49–53.
GIULIETTI A.M., MONTEIRO W.R., MAYO S.J. & J. STEPENS 1988. A preliminary survey of testa sculpture in Eriocaulaceae. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 62: 189–209.
GIULIETTI, A.M., ANDRADE M.J.G., SCATENAV.L., TROVÓ M., COAN A.I., SANO P.T., SANTOS F.A.R., BORGES R.L.B. & C. VANDENBERG 2012. Molecular phylogeny, morphology and their implications for the taxonomy of Eriocaulaceae. Rodriguésia 63(1): 001–019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S2175-78602012000100001
GOLOBOFF P.A., MATTONI C.I., A.S. QUINTEROS 2006. Continuous characters analyzed as such. Cladistics 22(6): 589–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00122.x
GOLOBOFF P.A., CARPENTER J.M. ARIAS S. & D.R.M. ESQUIVEL 2008. Weighting against homoplasy improves phylogenetic analysis of morphological data sets. Cladistics 24: 758–773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00209.x
GOLOBOFF P. & S. CATALANO 2016. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morpho-metrics. Cladistics 32: 221–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12160
GOLOBOFF P., TORRES A. & S. ARIAS 2018. Weighted parsimony outperforms other methods of phylogenetic inference under models appropriate for morphology. Cladistics 34: 407–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12205
KHOSHNAW D.M., OLIVEIRA A.L.R., DARSHETKAR A.M. & R.K. CHOUDHARY 2022. Leaf anatomy of Eriocaulon (Eriocaulaceae, Poales) species reveals a correlation between life form, anatomical features and life cycle. Flora 288: 152021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2022.152021
LARRIDON I., TANAKA N., LIANG Y., PHILLIPS S., BARFOD A., CHO S.H., GALE S., JOBSON R., KIM Y., LI J., MUASYA A., PARNELL J., PRAJAKSOOD A., SHUTOH K., SOULADETH P., TAGANE S., TANAKA N., YANO O., MESTERHAZY A. & Y. ITO 2019. First molecular phylogenetic insights into the evolution of Eriocaulon (Eriocaulaceae, Poales). Journal of Plant Research 132: 589–600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-019-01129-3
LEACH G.J. 2017. A revision of Australian Eriocaulon (Eriocaulaceae). Telopea 20: 205–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7751/telopea11531
LIANG Y., PHILLIPS S., CHEEK M. & I. LARRIDON 2019. A revision of the African genus Mesanthemum (Eriocaulaceae). Kew Bulletin 74: 71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-019-9853-y
NAIR, R.V. 1987. Taxonomic significance of seed coat morphology in Eriocaulon L. (Eriocaulaceae). Seed Science and Technology 15: 297–310.
PHILLIPS S.M. 1997. Flora of Tropical East Africa: Eriocaulaceae. Kew Press, Kew. p.43.
POWO 2025. Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available at: https://powo.science.kew.org/ (Accessed on 05.09.2025).
PROTHERO D. 2021. Neogene. In: ALDERTON D. & S.A. ELIAS (eds.), Encyclopedia of Geology. Second Edition. Volume 3. pp. 69–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.12507-2
RADFORD A.E. 1986. Fundamentals of plant systematics. Harper & Row Publishers, New York. p. xiii+-498.
RAMBAUT A. 2010. FigTree v1.3.1. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
RUHLAND W. 1903. Eriocaulaceae. In: ENGLER A. (ed.), Das Pflanzenreich, Berlin. Volume 13, n. 4, part. 30. pp. 1–294.
SATAKE B.Y 1940. Eriocaulaceae. In: NAKAI T. & M.N. HONDA (eds.), Nova Flora Japonica. The Sanseido Co., Tokyo & Osaka (in Japanese).
SERENO P 2007. Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics. Cladistics 26: 565–587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00161.x
WEI-LIANG M. 1991. New materials of Eriocaulon L. from China. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 29(4): 289.
WHEELER Q.D. 2008. Introductory: Toward the New Taxonomy. In: WHEELER, Q.D. (ed.) The New Taxonomy. CRC Press, Boca Raton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420008562
XU Y., DIETRICH C.H., ZHANG Y., DMITRIEV D.A., ZHANG L., WANG Y., LU S. & D. QIN 2020. NEXUS morphological data file for phylogenetic analysis of Empoascini. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-4470290_V1
ZHANG Z. 1999. Monographie der Gattung Eriocaulon in Ostasien. Stuttgart, Strauss offsetdruck gmbh. pp.289.